Readable in one screen · decide continue or stop first
ConceptFollowz – A simple RSS feed for the blogs of people you like
Would you pay $3-5/month for an RSS reader that is deliberat
Author · MicroValidatorLast updatedWho this is for A professional (developer, designer, writer, researcher) who follows 5-20 person
Core takeaway / TL;DR
The keyword signals possible interest in a simpler RSS reading experience, but t
Suggested next step Run a one-week falsifiable experiment: create a landing page
The keyword signals possible interest in a simpler RSS reading experience, but t
Next experiment
Run a one-week falsifiable experiment: create a landing page
Best thing to validate
A deliberately minimal RSS reader focused on following people (not managing feed
Biggest risk
RSS is a niche and shrinking space; free alternatives (Feedly free tier, browser
Critical assumption (summary)
Simplicity is the main differentiator people will pay for. The assumption is that existing RSS tools are too complex and
Show objections and continue/stop
Strongest objection
Free alternatives already solve the core job: Feedly's free tier, browser extensions, and email newsletters. RSS itself
Continue if
If 20+ signups and 3+ interviewees confirm active RSS usage with pain points and willingness to pay, build the minimal p
Pivot if
If fewer than 10 signups in a week, or interviews reveal people are satisfied with Feedly free tier / bookmarks / newsle
Show score rationale
Social media algorithms bury blog links, creating a potential need for direct feeds.,The decline of Google Reader may have left a gap for simple RSS products.,A minimal product with one clear job (follow people, see their posts) may be easier to market than feature-rich readers.
Fill the critical gaps (max 2)
“I don’t know” is fine — we give how to get evidence; we never invent interviews or payments.
02 Where the signal came from
Raw keyword
Followz – A simple RSS feed for the blogs of people you like
Is anyone searching? Relative interest — not monthly volume.
Trends 0–100 is relative interest, not monthly volume; 0 ≠ no demand.
Trends unchecked
Live search interest not checked yet. Conclusions below are hypotheses pending validation.
04 Business breakdown
Who needs this
A professional (developer, designer, writer, researcher) who follows 5-20 personal blogs and wants to read new posts regularly without social media noise or complex RSS reader configuration.
Job to be done
Keep up with new posts from specific people I respect, without missing updates, without algorithm noise, and without spending time configuring folders and categories.
Why they might pay
Hypothesis: the user pays for simplicity and focus - one page, people you follow, their latest posts. No folders, no AI, no noise. This is unvalidated.
Alternatives
Feedly free tier (feature-heavy, ads, overwhelming for casual users),Manual bookmark checking (time-consuming, easy to miss posts),Social media follows (posts get buried in algorithms),Email newsletters (only available for bloggers who offer them),Browser extensions like RSS Subscription Extension (minimal but not a reading experience)
Differentiation wedge
A single-page web app: paste a blog URL, auto-detect the RSS feed, see a chronological list of recent posts from people you follow. No folders, no categories, no signup wall for reading.
OPC scope
Minimal wedge: a single-page web app where users paste a blog URL, the app auto-detects the RSS feed, and shows a chronological list of recent posts from followed people. No folders, no categories, no AI features, no mobile apps.
Open questions
Do users want a hosted service or a self-hosted tool?
Should the product include an email digest as an alternative to visiting the app?
How many blogs does the typical target user follow? (This affects the need for organization features.)
Valid signal = real task completion, reuse, or pay intent — with observe + continue/stop.
01
Build a single landing page describing Followz with a waitlist email signup form. Include a one-line value proposition: 'Paste a blog URL, see new posts from people you like. No folders, no noise.'
Observe
Number of waitlist signups, click-through rate from the post to the landing page, any comments or feedback on the post.
Continue
20+ waitlist signups within one week from the HN/Reddit posts.
Stop
Fewer than 10 signups in one week, or comments indicate people are satisfied with existing tools and see no reason to switch.
02
Conduct 5-10 interviews (15 minutes each) with waitlist signups. Ask about current blog-following behavior, RSS usage history, frustration points, and willingness to pay $3-5/month.
Observe
How many interviewees actively use RSS or a manual workaround (bookmarks, social media lists). How many express concrete frustration. How many say 'yes, I would pay $3-5/month'.
Continue
At least 3 interviewees confirm active blog-following behavior with a pain point and state willingness to pay.
Stop
Interviews reveal people are satisfied with Feedly free tier, bookmarks, or newsletters, and see no reason to switch.
03
If interviews validate the pain point, build a minimal prototype (4 days): paste URL → auto-detect RSS → show chronological post list. Invite 10 waitlist signups to use it for one week.
Observe
How many of the 10 users return to the app after the first visit. How many follow 3+ blogs. Any friction in the URL-paste flow. Verbal feedback on whether they would pay.
Continue
5+ of 10 users return and follow 3+ blogs, and at least 3 say they would pay.
Stop
Users try it once and don't return, or say the free alternatives are 'good enough'.
FAQ
Should I keep building this idea?
The keyword signals possible interest in a simpler RSS reading experience, but t
What is the smallest next experiment?
Run a one-week falsifiable experiment: create a landing page
What is the biggest risk right now?
RSS is a niche and shrinking space; free alternatives (Feedly free tier, browser
Who is this validation for?
A professional (developer, designer, writer, researcher) who follows 5-20 personal blogs and wants to read new posts regularly without social media noise or complex RSS reader configuration.
How should I read the score?
Current OPC feasibility score is 4/100. It is an AI-assisted executability check, not a market guarantee. Low scores mean “prove demand first,” not “never build.”
07 Evidence & boundaries
Demand evidence summary
No external evidence beyond the HN keyword itself. No user interviews, no usage data, no payment evidence. Demand is entirely unvalidated.
External record
A post titled 'Followz - A simple RSS feed for the blogs of people you like' appeared on Hacker News, indicating some interest in this concept. · Source: Hacker News (user-provided keyword context) · Not specified · Supports: interest
User-stated
None
Model hypothesis
People who read personal blogs may follow them via social media (Twitter/X, LinkedIn) where posts get buried in algorithms, creating a need for a direct feed.
Existing RSS readers (Feedly, Inoreader) offer many features (folders, categories, AI summaries, team features) that may feel overwhelming to casual blog readers.
Email newsletters only work for bloggers who offer them; many personal blogs do not have newsletter distribution.
The 'people you like' framing may differentiate from feed-based readers by organizing around relationships rather than topics.
Known facts
RSS is a well-established technology for syndicating blog content.
The keyword appeared on Hacker News, indicating some interest in the concept.
Email newsletters are a common way people follow blogs, but not all bloggers offer them.
Unverified assumptions
People who read personal blogs may find existing RSS readers too complex.
A 'people-focused' framing (vs. feed-focused) may differentiate the product.
The target user follows 5-20 blogs and wants a simple reading experience.
Willingness to pay exists at $3-5/month (unvalidated).
AI inference: Social media algorithms bury blog links, creating a potential need for direct feeds.,The decline of Google Reader may have left a gap for simple RSS products.,A minimal product with one clear job (follow people, see their posts) may be easier to market than feature-rich readers.
Share the judgment08 Share
Tap an icon for poster, caption, and link.
Tap a platform: poster + caption + report link.
Share to
microvalidatorIdea validation card
Feasibility draft
Opportunity
Risk
Next
Would you pay for this?
Advanced: one-click frontend skeleton
Turn this idea into a single-file HTML MVP (Tailwind CDN + core interaction mock).